Ripple XRP lawsuit decision diverged in Ripple XRP SEC saga

From the perspective of a pre-IPO analyst covering the XRP Ripple SEC case, the situation is as follows:

A federal judge in New York, US District Judge Jed Rakoff, has diverged from the Ripple lawsuit decision made earlier this month by another judge. The judge ruled that Ripple Labs' token was not a security when sold to the public on secondary markets. This adds a layer of complexity to the already uncertain environment surrounding cryptocurrency regulation.

Judge Rakoff allowed the SEC to proceed with its case against Terraform Labs Pte and its founder, Do Kwon, explicitly rejecting the distinction made in the Ripple case between sales to the public and those to institutional investors.

The July 13 Ripple ruling, which deemed Ripple's XRP token a security when sold to institutional investors but not to the general public, was seen as a landmark victory for the cryptocurrency industry. Most coins experienced a surge in value in its wake. Judge Rakoff's decision doesn't overturn the Ripple ruling, but it does indicate that the question of when a digital asset qualifies as a security remains unresolved. This ongoing confusion could strengthen the case for lawmakers to introduce new legislation to clarify the matter.

The SEC had urged Judge Rakoff not to adopt the reasoning used by US District Judge Analisa Torres in the Ripple case, and the regulator is also considering an appeal of that decision. Judge Torres applied the Howey test, which defines an investment contract as a security if there's an "investment of money in a common enterprise with a reasonable expectation of profits to be derived from the efforts of others." She found that sales of XRP to sophisticated investors met this test, but not sales to the general public.

In contrast, Judge Rakoff said in the Terra decision that the manner of sale does not matter and that Judge Torres's distinction was not valid. This stance by Judge Rakoff could have implications for how tokens are treated under securities laws in the future.

The SEC has also accused Terraform Labs and Kwon of offering and selling unregistered securities as part of a fraudulent scheme. The allegations apply to both institutional and retail investors. Rakoff stated that both types of investors had reason to believe that the defendants would use their capital to generate profits.

In summary, the differing opinions between Judge Rakoff and Judge Torres on applying securities law to digital assets could signify a shift in legal thinking. This situation may prompt new legislation or regulatory clarification, impacting how Ripple and other cryptocurrencies will operate. The complexities of this legal landscape need to be closely monitored, as they can significantly affect the value and legal standing of Ripple's XRP and other similar digital assets.

For more coverage about Ripple stock, subscribe to our club letter

Ripple Stock

Ripple's stock price has been hedging higher, though the price raise started before the judgment. The company has tendered up to 5% of its shares at $61.48

Ripple IPO

The recent ruling that classified XRP as a non-security digital asset, which is significant for Ripple, the XRP community, and the broader crypto sector, has ignited discussions about a potential Initial Public Offering (IPO) for Ripple. This speculation comes after a court victory against the US Securities and Exchange Commission, following nearly three years of legal battles.

Should Ripple decide to pursue an IPO, it would represent one of the first major cases of a blockchain company entering traditional financial markets, setting a precedent within the cryptocurrency industry. An IPO could provide Ripple with additional capital for growth and enhance its credibility among traditional financial entities. However, as of now, many details, such as the possible valuation of the IPO and the timing of its launch, are still speculative.

Ripple Valuation

Ripple's value was estimated at $9.8 billion in December 2019, following a $200 million Series C funding round. Subsequently, the company repurchased shares from its investors, raising its valuation to $15 billion—a 33% increase from its previous worth. This act not only reflects Ripple's confidence, especially considering the ongoing SEC lawsuit but also bodes well for the prospect of an IPO. Although the details of Ripple's financials are private, a company spokesperson has emphasized Ripple's strong market position after the share buyback, stating, "Ripple is cash flow positive, has $1 billion in the bank, and a strong balance sheet." This robust financial standing could be a promising sign for Ripple's transition to public markets.

Ripple

Ripple, founded in 2012, is a technology company based in San Francisco focusing on digital payments and blockchain solutions. It developed the RippleNet payment network and the XRP cryptocurrency to facilitate fast, low-cost cross-border transactions. Ripple's innovative technology is designed to improve the efficiency of financial institutions and payment providers globally, streamlining remittances and monetary transfers.

What is IPO CLUB

We are a club of Investors with a barbell strategy: very early and late-stage investments. We leverage our experience to select investments in the world’s most promising companies.

 

Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Please consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Previous
Previous

Epic Games stock and Epic Games IPO

Next
Next

Boxabl, Inventory Homes, and the Casita: A Perspective on Modern Housing Solutions