Tanium vs. Rubrik
Tanium and Rubrik, both prominent players in the cybersecurity and IT space, cater to different market needs. While Tanium focuses on endpoint security and IT operations, Rubrik specializes in data management and ransomware recovery. The valuation comparison, growth trajectory, and market potential of these companies offer distinct investment considerations.
Comparison of Businesses: Tanium vs. Rubrik
Tanium
Tanium
• Core Offering: Endpoint detection and response (EDR) with a focus on large enterprise networks. Tanium provides real-time visibility and control over endpoints (e.g., laptops, servers, mobile devices) to manage, secure, and monitor IT environments. Its platform supports:
• Threat detection and remediation.
• Compliance reporting.
• Asset discovery and IT operations.
• Target Market: Enterprises with extensive endpoint infrastructure, often in highly regulated industries (e.g., government, healthcare, finance).
• Strengths:
• Highly scalable architecture designed for large, distributed environments.
• Strong reputation among enterprise customers for speed and reliability in threat detection.
• Positioned as a dual-use technology for both security and IT operations.
• Weaknesses:
• Limited diversification compared to broader security platforms.
• High cost and complexity can deter smaller enterprises.
For more coverage about Cybersecurity, subscribe to our club letter.
Rubrik
• Core Offering: Cloud data management and ransomware recovery. Rubrik focuses on protecting critical business data by providing:
• Backup, disaster recovery, and archival services.
• Ransomware detection and data immutability (ensuring unaltered backups).
• Multi-cloud management for data security and compliance.
• Target Market: Enterprises across industries that prioritize secure data storage and recovery, with a strong emphasis on ransomware resilience.
• Strengths:
• Differentiated by its strong ransomware recovery capabilities, which are in high demand due to rising attacks.
• Broader addressable market due to applicability in diverse data management use cases.
• High customer stickiness because data management is mission-critical and switching costs are substantial.
• Weaknesses:
• More competition from cloud-native backup and recovery solutions like AWS Backup.
• A narrower focus on data protection rather than holistic endpoint security.
Business Model Comparison
Key Difference:
Tanium addresses a broader $set of endpoint security and management needs, while Rubrik specializes in data security and recovery.
Should Tanium Be Worth More Than Rubrik?
At a $11 billion valuation in the secondary market, Tanium’s pricing assumes it commands a premium over Rubrik’s $9.3 billion public valuation. This raises critical valuation considerations:
Liquidity Discount
• Rubrik is publicly traded, offering immediate liquidity and transparency in valuation.
• Tanium, as a private company, typically warrants a discount due to the illiquidity of its shares. A 15-30% illiquidity discount is common for secondary market transactions, depending on growth rates and strategic potential.
Revenue and Growth Comparison
• Tanium reportedly generates $500-$600 million ARR, with a growth rate in the 15-20% range. This implies a valuation multiple of ~18-22x ARR.
• Rubrik likely has similar ARR (~$500-$600 million) but with a higher growth rate (~30-40%). Its valuation multiple on ARR is ~16-18x.
Should Tanium Command a Higher Valuation?
• Positives for Tanium:
• Broader cybersecurity functionality (beyond ransomware recovery) provides greater long-term market potential.
• Strategic value in defense/government contracts due to endpoint security focus.
• Negatives for Tanium:
• Slower growth rate compared to Rubrik.
• Higher illiquidity risk as a private company.
Without a significant differentiator or growth advantage, Tanium arguably should trade at a discount to Rubrik, especially accounting for liquidity risk.
Which Company Should be more interesting?
Rubrik Pros:
• Public Market Advantages: Liquidity and transparency reduce exit risk.
• Growth Leader: Faster growth in ARR, with significant tailwinds from ransomware and multi-cloud adoption.
• Sticky Revenue: Strong retention due to criticality of its solutions.
Tanium Pros:
• Broader Strategic Play: Positioned in endpoint management, which aligns with government and enterprise security priorities.
• Potential for Upside in a Strategic Acquisition: Companies like Microsoft or Google could find Tanium’s endpoint dominance attractive.
Key Considerations for the Investors:
• Liquidity and Exit Strategy: Rubrik’s public listing allows flexibility for exit, while Tanium’s private status ties your timeline to potential IPO or secondary sales.
• Valuation Discipline: Rubrik’s lower valuation multiple and stronger growth rate make it more compelling in a direct comparison.
• Strategic Fit: If the investor prioritizes endpoint security as a key thesis, Tanium aligns better with that mandate.
Takeaway:
• If seeking lower-risk exposure with high growth, Rubrik is the better option.
• If willing to accept illiquidity risk for a potentially transformative exit or strategic acquisition, Tanium could justify investment, but only if the valuation reflects a significant discount (~$9 billion or less).
Given current valuations, Rubrik’s public market position and growth trajectory make it the more attractive option for the investor at this time.
Which one is more likely to return a 4x exit?
Achieving a 4x exit requires identifying which company has the potential for significant valuation growth from its current pricing. Let’s assess Tanium and Rubrik on key factors that influence their scalability, market opportunity, and likelihood of delivering a 4x return:
Tanium: $11 Billion Valuation (Secondary Market)
Upside Drivers:
1. Endpoint Security Market Growth:
• The global endpoint security market is expected to grow at a CAGR of ~8-10% through 2030, driven by increasing ransomware threats, remote work trends, and regulatory compliance needs.
• Tanium’s focus on government and regulated industries provides a defensible niche with strategic contracts, often benefiting from higher-than-average margins.
2. Strategic Value in M&A:
• Companies like Microsoft, Google, or Amazon could find Tanium attractive as part of a broader platform strategy. A premium acquisition could significantly boost exit valuation.
• The cybersecurity sector has seen acquisitions at 10-15x ARR, suggesting Tanium could reach a $15-$20 billion valuation in a strategic exit.
3. Dual-Use Capabilities:
• Tanium’s platform spans both IT operations and security, increasing its addressable market beyond pure-play cybersecurity firms like Rubrik.
Challenges:
• Valuation Ceiling: At $11 billion, a 4x exit would require a valuation of $44 billion, which is ambitious in the endpoint market unless growth accelerates or it becomes part of a larger platform ecosystem.
• Growth Rate: Current 15-20% growth lags market leaders in cybersecurity, limiting multiple expansion potential unless operational metrics significantly improve.
4x Probability:
Low-Moderate (15-20% chance).
• Achievable primarily through M&A rather than organic growth, given its slower ARR expansion.
Rubrik: $9.3 Billion Valuation (Public Market)
Upside Drivers:
1. Ransomware Resilience:
• Rubrik directly addresses ransomware recovery—a critical enterprise pain point—positioning itself at the intersection of data management and cybersecurity.
• This segment is expected to grow at a CAGR of 13-15%, significantly outpacing traditional IT and endpoint security.
2. Multi-Cloud Adoption:
• Enterprises are increasingly adopting multi-cloud strategies, driving demand for Rubrik’s cloud-agnostic solutions. Its partnerships with Microsoft, AWS, and Google bolster its credibility and distribution.
3. Public Market Growth Potential:
• Rubrik has a path to expand its market cap through revenue growth (~30-40% CAGR), operational leverage, and valuation multiple expansion.
• If Rubrik achieves $2-$3 billion ARR in 5-6 years, it could justify a 25-30x ARR valuation, translating to a $25-$30 billion market cap.
Challenges:
• Competition: Facing increasing competition from cloud-native providers (e.g., AWS Backup, Cohesity) and legacy players (e.g., Dell EMC), which could pressure pricing and margins.
• Public Market Constraints: Rubrik’s valuation growth is tied to broader market conditions, making it susceptible to macroeconomic downturns.
4x Probability:
Moderate-High (30-40% chance).
• Likely through organic growth in ARR and operational scaling. A strategic M&A by a hyperscaler (e.g., AWS, Microsoft) could accelerate this outcome.
Comparative Analysis
Which Is More Likely to 4x?
Rubrik:
• Stronger organic growth trajectory due to ransomware recovery and multi-cloud adoption.
• Lower starting valuation ($9.3 billion) makes a 4x exit more achievable.
• Public market status allows easier scaling of valuation multiples if revenue metrics improve.
Tanium:
• While Tanium could achieve a 4x return, this is more likely in a strategic M&A scenario, as its organic growth lags the broader cybersecurity market.
• Its higher starting valuation creates a higher bar for exponential returns.
Takeaway:
If the goal is to maximize the likelihood of a 4x exit, Rubrik presents the stronger case due to its faster growth, lower starting valuation, and favorable market tailwinds. However, if the investor prioritizes alignment with U.S. defense and dual-use technologies, Tanium might still warrant a smaller, strategic allocation.
What is IPO CLUB
We are a club of Investors with a barbell strategy: very early and late-stage investments. We leverage our experience to select investments in the world’s most promising companies.
Disclaimer
Private companies carry inherent risks and may not be suitable for all investors. The information provided in this article is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Always conduct thorough research and seek professional financial guidance before making investment decisions.
